[Catalist] Religions and the Theory of Biological Evolution

Mon Aug 14 12:21:10 AEST 2017

I'm with Mike. I would say "stop teaching Intelligent Design in science classes" for the same reasons I would say "stop teaching French, Roman History, non-Euclidean Geometry. .." All interesting, valuable subjects but they are not part of the science curriculum. 

Sent from my Samsung GALAXY S5

-------- Original message --------
From: Tim Keely <T.Keely at curtin.edu.au> 
Date: 14/08/2017  10:00 AM  (GMT+08:00) 
To: catalist at lists.stawa.net 
Subject: Re: [Catalist] Religions and the Theory of Biological Evolution 

LOL, Brendan, sorry

From: Catalist [mailto:catalist-bounces at lists.stawa.net]
On Behalf Of brendan o'brien

Sent: Monday, 14 August 2017 9:53 AM

To: catalist at lists.stawa.net

Subject: Re: [Catalist] Religions and the Theory of Biological Evolution

"Why not teach them all?” asks Tom

…. because in the science classroom we teach the science of evolution that is backed by a strong preponderance of multiple lines of evidence.

Myths and other non-science ‘theories', past and present, can freely be taught in English, History and other parts of the curriculum

__________________________

Brendan O’Brien

THOONA VIC 3726

Australia

+61 (0)498 591 046

oscience2006 at gmail.com

@Astrophiz on Twitter

Astrophiz Website 

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Astrophiz

Stream or Download Astrophiz Podcasts https://soundcloud.com/astrophiz

Find and subscribe 'Astrophiz Podcasts’ on iTunes

Soundcloud RSS: http://feeds.soundcloud.com/users/soundcloud:users:13051063/sounds.rss

__________________________

On 14 Aug 2017, at 11:30 am, Tim Keely <T.Keely at curtin.edu.au> wrote:

http://listverse.com/2013/03/08/10-alternatives-to-evolution/

why not teach them all?

Please people, please.

Tim Keely

From: Catalist
 [mailto:catalist-bounces at lists.stawa.net] On Behalf Of Michael Podgorny JP

Sent: Monday, 14 August 2017 9:03 AM

To: catalist at lists.stawa.net

Subject: Re: [Catalist] Religions and the Theory of Biological Evolution

Dear Michael

Thanks for the posting of this article.  

I believe that as an educator it is our responsibility to educate the students and deliver material to them allowing the students to make an informed decision.  This relates
 to theories past and present.

I am surprised that you would ask a teacher to stop teaching intelligent design and reduce the potential for the students to make informed decisions to become independent learners
 based on the information provided.

I also find it disconcerting that you needed to state "(a Catholic)".  It should not matter which religion you are to teach Science or scientific theories/laws/practices to students.

Michael Podgorny JP

BA, BEd, MSc, LLB (Hons), Grad Dip Leg Prac

Cert IV Workplace Trainer and Assessor

This email is confidential and may also be privileged. Any personal data in this email (including any attachments) must be handled with confidence as the contents are intended to be a confidential communication between the writer and the recipient.

From: Catalist
 <catalist-bounces at lists.stawa.net> on behalf of Michael McGarry <mmcgarry44 at gmail.com>

Sent: Monday, 14 August 2017 8:17:08 AM

To: catalist at lists.stawa.net

Subject: [Catalist] Religions and the Theory of Biological Evolution

Greetings Science Colleagues,

Some years ago as Science Head of Department in a WA State Government senior high school, I had to ask a science teacher (a Catholic) to stop teaching intelligent design to his Year 10 science students.

URL 1: http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/id_checklist

URL 2: https://www.aaas.org/news/aaas-board-resolution-intelligent-design-theory

URL 3: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/15-answers-to-creationist/

URL 4:http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2012/05/the-whys-of-religion-vs-evolution/

URL 5:http://sci.waikato.ac.nz/evolution/EvolutionReligion.shtml

I have recently studied the Stanford Encyclopaedia Philosophy: Religion and Science. I was especially interested in the reasons for the historical decline of Science in Islamic countries. [The Stanford
 Encyclopaedia Philosophy: Religion and Science being a dissertation on Philosophy is a difficult read!]

Section 2.2 “Science and religion in Islam” in the online publication “The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy: Religion and Science” states that: “The
 defining characteristic of Islam is its belief in one God (Allah), who communicates through prophets, including Adam, Abraham, and Muhammad” and that; “Allah’s revelations to Muhammad are recorded in the Quran, the central religious text for Islam” and that; “Since
 the Quran explicitly mentions the special creation of Adam out of clay, most Muslims refuse to accept that humans evolved out of hominin ancestors. Nevertheless, Muslim scientists such as Guessoum (2009) and Rana Dajani (2015) have advocated acceptance of
 [biological] evolution.”

Reference URL 6:https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/religion-science/

Biological Evolution – An Islamic Perspective

URL 7:http://www.islamreligion.com/articles/657/biological-evolution-an-islamic-perspective/

NAS Online Evolution Resources

URL 8:http://www.nas.edu/evolution/IntelligentDesign.html

URL 9: http://www.nas.edu/evolution/FAQ.html

Best Wishes,

Michael John McGarry

_______________________________________________

Catalist mailing list

Catalist at lists.stawa.net

http://lists.stawa.net/mailman/listinfo/catalist_lists.stawa.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.stawa.net/pipermail/catalist_lists.stawa.net/attachments/20170814/088ffc8f/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 118049 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.stawa.net/pipermail/catalist_lists.stawa.net/attachments/20170814/088ffc8f/attachment.png>