[Catalist] Genetics question for Bio/ Human Bio Teachers

[SNELL Hazel [Geraldton Senior College]]

My understanding on genetics problems has always been if a question asked the probability of a child with the disorder the answer would be 25%  and when it is asked for daughters it is 50% as you have reasoned.


Kind regards

Hazel Snell
Career Development
Geraldton Senior College
08 99658400



From: Catalist [mailto:catalist-bounces at lists.stawa.net] On Behalf Of Greg Munyard
Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2017 9:52 AM
To: 'catalist at lists.stawa.net'
Subject: [Catalist] Genetics question for Bio/ Human Bio Teachers

Good morning folks

My colleagues and I are having some discussion around this question and I wondered if there is a consensus in the Bio/ Human Bio community on this:

"If II-8 (XnY) and II-9 (XNXn) have more children, what is the probability that they will produce an affected daughter?" (Genotypes not in the original question - had to be ascertained from a pedigree.)

One colleague's approach is to say that there is a 50% chance for producing a daughter and 50% chance that a daughter will be affected so the combination of these is a probability of 25%.

My approach is to say that there is zero chance for sons to be daughters so that they represent a null sample. Considering only daughters then the chance of an affected daughter is 50%.

Any guidance out there in the ether?

Regards

Greg Munyard
Senior Teacher - Science
[kennedy_email-footer-t4]

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.stawa.net/pipermail/catalist_lists.stawa.net/attachments/20171026/e8323a72/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 89896 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.stawa.net/pipermail/catalist_lists.stawa.net/attachments/20171026/e8323a72/attachment.jpg>